| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2013 14:13:54 +0100 From: Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu> To: "Li, Fei" <fei.li@...el.com> Cc: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>, "Brown, Len" <len.brown@...el.com>, "Wang, Biao" <biao.wang@...el.com>, "peterz@...radead.org" <peterz@...radead.org>, "linux-pm@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>, "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, "fuse-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net" <fuse-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net>, "mingo@...hat.com" <mingo@...hat.com>, "Liu, Chuansheng" <chuansheng.liu@...el.com> Subject: Re: [fuse-devel] Getting rid of freezer for suspend [was Re: [PATCH] fuse: make fuse daemon frozen along with kernel threads] On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 3:54 AM, Li, Fei <fei.li@...el.com> wrote: >> From: Pavel Machek [mailto:pavel@....cz] >> >> freeze_priority? >> >> I _hope_ we will not need more than three priorities, (user, fused, kernel), but >> I hoped not no need more than two before, so... > > IMHO, we still use two priorities, with the exception that user space process such > as fuse daemon can be configured to be frozen in kernel threads frozen phase > instead of user space processes frozen phase. I'm not sure that will work. Fuse processes are in fact ordinary userspace processes, and so should be frozen before kernel threads. Thanks, Miklos -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists