linux-kernel - [PATCH V2 1/1] staging: android: ashmem: get_name,set_name not to hold ashmem

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1361370428-30632-2-git-send-email-shankoo77@gmail.com>
Date:	Wed, 20 Feb 2013 19:57:08 +0530
From:	"Shankar Brahadeeswaran" <shankoo77@...il.com>
To:	"Greg Kroah-Hartman" <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	"Dan Carpenter" <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
cc:	devel@...verdev.osuosl.org,
	"Cruz Julian Bishop" <cruzjbishop@...il.com>,
	"Andrew Morton" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	"Hugh Dickins" <hughd@...gle.com>,
	"Konstantin Khlebnikov" <khlebnikov@...nvz.org>,
	"Shankar Brahadeeswaran" <shankoo77@...il.com>
Subject: [PATCH V2 1/1] staging: android: ashmem: get_name,set_name not
 to hold ashmem_mutex

Problem:
There exists a path in ashmem driver that could lead to acquistion
of mm->mmap_sem, ashmem_mutex in reverse order. This could lead
to deadlock in the system.
For Example, assume that mmap is called on a ashmem region
in the context of a thread say T1.
 sys_mmap_pgoff (1. acquires mm->mmap_sem)
  |
   --> mmap_region
 	|
         ----> ashmem_mmap (2. acquires asmem_mutex)
 Now if there is a context switch after 1 and before 2,
 and if another thread T2 (that shares the mm struct) invokes an
 ioctl say ASHMEM_GET_NAME, this can lead to the following path

ashmem_ioctl
  |
  -->get_name (3. acquires ashmem_mutex)
	|
	---> copy_to_user (4. acquires the mm->mmap_sem)
Note that the copy_to_user could lead to a valid fault if no
physical page is allocated yet for the user address passed.
Now T1 has mmap_sem and is waiting for ashmem_mutex.
and T2 has the ashmem_mutex and is waiting for mmap_sem
Thus leading to deadlock.

Solution:
Do not call copy_to_user or copy_from_user while holding the
ahsmem_mutex. Instead copy this to a local buffer that lives
in the stack while holding this lock. This will maintain data
integrity as well never reverse the lock order.

Testing:
Created a unit test case to reproduce the problem.
Used the same to test this fix on kernel version 3.4.0
Ported the same patch to 3.8

Signed-off-by: Shankar Brahadeeswaran <shankoo77@...il.com>
Reviewed-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
---
 drivers/staging/android/ashmem.c |   56 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------
 1 files changed, 36 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/staging/android/ashmem.c b/drivers/staging/android/ashmem.c
index 634b9ae..497d044 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/android/ashmem.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/android/ashmem.c
@@ -413,50 +413,66 @@ out:
 
 static int set_name(struct ashmem_area *asma, void __user *name)
 {
-	int ret = 0;
-
-	mutex_lock(&ashmem_mutex);
+	char local_name[ASHMEM_NAME_LEN];
 
 	/* cannot change an existing mapping's name */
-	if (unlikely(asma->file)) {
-		ret = -EINVAL;
-		goto out;
-	}
+	if (unlikely(asma->file))
+		return -EINVAL;
 
-	if (unlikely(copy_from_user(asma->name + ASHMEM_NAME_PREFIX_LEN,
-				    name, ASHMEM_NAME_LEN)))
-		ret = -EFAULT;
-	asma->name[ASHMEM_FULL_NAME_LEN-1] = '\0';
+	/*
+	 * Holding the ashmem_mutex while doing a copy_from_user might cause
+	 * an data abourt which would try to access mmap_sem. If another
+	 * thread has invoked ashmem_mmap then it will be holding the
+	 * semaphore and will be waiting for ashmem_mutex, there by leading to
+	 * deadlock. We'll release the mutex  and take the name to a local
+	 * variable that does not need protection and later copy the local
+	 * variable to the structure member with lock held.
+	 */
+	if (unlikely(copy_from_user(local_name, name, ASHMEM_NAME_LEN)))
+		return -EFAULT;
 
-out:
+	mutex_lock(&ashmem_mutex);
+	memcpy(asma->name + ASHMEM_NAME_PREFIX_LEN,
+		local_name, ASHMEM_NAME_LEN);
+	asma->name[ASHMEM_FULL_NAME_LEN-1] = '\0';
 	mutex_unlock(&ashmem_mutex);
 
-	return ret;
+	return 0;
 }
 
 static int get_name(struct ashmem_area *asma, void __user *name)
 {
 	int ret = 0;
+	size_t len;
+	/*
+	 * Have a local variable to which we'll copy the content
+	 * from asma with the lock held. Later we can copy this to the user
+	 * space safely without holding any locks. So even if we proceed to
+	 * wait for mmap_sem, it won't lead to deadlock.
+	 */
+	char local_name[ASHMEM_NAME_LEN];
 
 	mutex_lock(&ashmem_mutex);
 	if (asma->name[ASHMEM_NAME_PREFIX_LEN] != '\0') {
-		size_t len;
 
 		/*
 		 * Copying only `len', instead of ASHMEM_NAME_LEN, bytes
 		 * prevents us from revealing one user's stack to another.
 		 */
 		len = strlen(asma->name + ASHMEM_NAME_PREFIX_LEN) + 1;
-		if (unlikely(copy_to_user(name,
-				asma->name + ASHMEM_NAME_PREFIX_LEN, len)))
-			ret = -EFAULT;
+		memcpy(local_name, asma->name + ASHMEM_NAME_PREFIX_LEN, len);
 	} else {
-		if (unlikely(copy_to_user(name, ASHMEM_NAME_DEF,
-					  sizeof(ASHMEM_NAME_DEF))))
-			ret = -EFAULT;
+		len = sizeof(ASHMEM_NAME_DEF);
+		memcpy(local_name, ASHMEM_NAME_DEF, len);
 	}
 	mutex_unlock(&ashmem_mutex);
 
+	/*
+	 * Now we are just copying from the stack variable to userland
+	 * No lock held
+	 */
+	if (unlikely(copy_to_user(name, local_name, len)))
+		ret = -EFAULT;
 	return ret;
 }
 
-- 
1.7.6


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/