[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5124E520.709@suse.cz>
Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2013 16:00:48 +0100
From: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.cz>
To: Pawel Wieczorkiewicz <wpawel@...il.com>, nicolas.ferre@...el.com,
gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, grant.likely@...retlab.ca
CC: linux-serial@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] tty: atmel_serial_probe(): index of atmel_ports[]
fix
On 02/13/2013 12:17 AM, Pawel Wieczorkiewicz wrote:
> From: Pawel Wieczorkiewicz <wpawel@...il.com>
>
> Index of atmel_ports[ATMEL_MAX_UART] should be smaller
> than ATMEL_MAX_UART.
>
> Signed-off-by: Pawel Wieczorkiewicz <wpawel@...il.com>
> ---
> drivers/tty/serial/atmel_serial.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/tty/serial/atmel_serial.c b/drivers/tty/serial/atmel_serial.c
> index d4a7c24..3f7586a 100644
> --- a/drivers/tty/serial/atmel_serial.c
> +++ b/drivers/tty/serial/atmel_serial.c
> @@ -1772,7 +1772,7 @@ static int atmel_serial_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> ret = find_first_zero_bit(&atmel_ports_in_use,
> sizeof(atmel_ports_in_use));
>
> - if (ret > ATMEL_MAX_UART) {
> + if (!(ret < ATMEL_MAX_UART)) {
Good catch, but the result looks weird. Could you just make it ">="?
And find_first_zero_bit + sizeof above is bogus too. The sizeof returns
4 on 32-bit (the driver is run on 32bit machines exlusively AFAICS). So
the highest possible ret in there is 5. Instead atmel_ports_in_use
should be declared using DECLARE_BITMAP(atmel_ports_in_use,
ATMEL_MAX_UART) and the second parameter here then ATMEL_MAX_UART.
Could you fix that too?
--
js
suse labs
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists