linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 1/4] acpi: move x86/mm/srat.c to x86/kernel/acpi/srat.c

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1361325113.7859.37.camel@liguang.fnst.cn.fujitsu.com>
Date:	Wed, 20 Feb 2013 09:51:53 +0800
From:	li guang <lig.fnst@...fujitsu.com>
To:	David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
	x86@...nel.org, isimatu.yasuaki@...fujitsu.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/4] acpi: move x86/mm/srat.c to
 x86/kernel/acpi/srat.c

在 2013-02-20三的 09:39 +0800，li guang写道：
> 在 2013-02-19二的 13:21 -0800，David Rientjes写道：
> > On Fri, 15 Feb 2013, liguang wrote:
> > 
> > > srat table should present only on acpi domain,
> > > seems mm/ is not the right place for it.
> > > 
> > > Reviewed-by: Yasuaki Ishimatsu <isimatu.yasuaki@...fujitsu.com>
> > > Signed-off-by: liguang <lig.fnst@...fujitsu.com>
> > 
> > This doesn't apply to Linus' tree nor does it apply to linux-next.  Which 
> > tree are you basing this on?
> 
> I did based on linux-next, 
> but it seems without commit 479a99a8e510c8839e0d3d3de8391f8bc61b9760
> which you may want to see.
> let me see why it missed.

I pulled latest for linux-next
and can apply my patches smoothly.


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/