[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87hal6iv6w.fsf@xmission.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2013 12:31:19 -0800
From: ebiederm@...ssion.com (Eric W. Biederman)
To: "Raphael S.Carvalho" <raphael.scarv@...il.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] kernel/fork.c: Simplifying a snippet of code.
"Raphael S.Carvalho" <raphael.scarv@...il.com> writes:
> Just sending this patch in order to simplify the code.
> However, I'm not sure if the code was written in that way due to
> specific reasons.
That doesn't look any simpler to me, and I expect you have now biased
the branch in the wrong direction.
The CLONE_THREAD is not the common case.
Eric
> Signed-off-by: Raphael S.Carvalho <raphael.scarv@...il.com>
> ---
> kernel/fork.c | 4 +---
> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/fork.c b/kernel/fork.c
> index c535f33..237204d 100644
> --- a/kernel/fork.c
> +++ b/kernel/fork.c
> @@ -1341,9 +1341,7 @@ static struct task_struct *copy_process(unsigned long clone_flags,
> }
>
> p->pid = pid_nr(pid);
> - p->tgid = p->pid;
> - if (clone_flags & CLONE_THREAD)
> - p->tgid = current->tgid;
> + p->tgid = (clone_flags & CLONE_THREAD) ? current->tgid : p->pid;
>
> p->set_child_tid = (clone_flags & CLONE_CHILD_SETTID) ? child_tidptr : NULL;
> /*
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists