linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH -next] security/integrity/ima: make part_pack

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1361389581.29360.14.camel@falcor1>
Date:	Wed, 20 Feb 2013 14:46:21 -0500
From:	Mimi Zohar <zohar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To:	Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
Cc:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
	linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Mimi Zohar <zohar@...ibm.com>, axboe@...nel.dk
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next] security/integrity/ima: make part_pack_uuid()
 always visible

On Wed, 2013-02-20 at 11:30 -0800, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> On 02/20/13 08:50, Mimi Zohar wrote:
> > On Tue, 2013-02-19 at 16:28 -0800, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> >> On 02/18/13 22:03, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> >>> Hi all,
> >>>
> >>> Changes since 20130218:
> >>>
> >>
> >> on x86_64:
> >>
> >>   CC      security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.o
> >> security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c: In function 'ima_parse_rule':
> >> security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c:538:4: error: implicit declaration of function 'part_pack_uuid' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
> >> cc1: some warnings being treated as errors
> >> make[4]: *** [security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.o] Error 1
> >>
> >>
> >> Full randconfig file is attached.
> > 
> > part_pack_uuid() is only defined for CONFIG_BLOCK in
> > include/linux/genhd.h.  One solution would be to add a stub function
> > definition in include/linux/genhd.h, the other option would be to ifndef
> > CONFIG_BLOCK in C code.
> 
> ITYM #ifdef CONFIG_BLOCK to call part_pack_uuid().
> Yes, either of those would work.
> How about a third option -- just make part_pack_uuid() always visible
> and not just a stub?  Patch is below.

That works too.

Acked-by: Mimi Zohar <zohar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>

thanks,

Mimi

> ---
> From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
> 
> Fix build error when CONFIG_BLOCK is not enabled
> by making the static inline function part_pack_uuid()
> visible independent of CONFIG_BLOCK's setting.
> 
> security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c:538:4: error: implicit declaration of function 'part_pack_uuid' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
> 
> Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
> Cc: Mimi Zohar <zohar@...ibm.com>
> ---
>  include/linux/genhd.h |   36 ++++++++++++++++++------------------
>  1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
> 
> --- linux-next-20130220.orig/include/linux/genhd.h
> +++ linux-next-20130220/include/linux/genhd.h
> @@ -213,24 +213,6 @@ static inline struct gendisk *part_to_di
>  	return NULL;
>  }
> 
> -static inline void part_pack_uuid(const u8 *uuid_str, u8 *to)
> -{
> -	int i;
> -	for (i = 0; i < 16; ++i) {
> -		*to++ = (hex_to_bin(*uuid_str) << 4) |
> -			(hex_to_bin(*(uuid_str + 1)));
> -		uuid_str += 2;
> -		switch (i) {
> -		case 3:
> -		case 5:
> -		case 7:
> -		case 9:
> -			uuid_str++;
> -			continue;
> -		}
> -	}
> -}
> -
>  static inline int disk_max_parts(struct gendisk *disk)
>  {
>  	if (disk->flags & GENHD_FL_EXT_DEVT)
> @@ -720,4 +702,22 @@ static inline dev_t blk_lookup_devt(cons
> 
>  #endif /* CONFIG_BLOCK */
> 
> +static inline void part_pack_uuid(const u8 *uuid_str, u8 *to)
> +{
> +	int i;
> +	for (i = 0; i < 16; ++i) {
> +		*to++ = (hex_to_bin(*uuid_str) << 4) |
> +			(hex_to_bin(*(uuid_str + 1)));
> +		uuid_str += 2;
> +		switch (i) {
> +		case 3:
> +		case 5:
> +		case 7:
> +		case 9:
> +			uuid_str++;
> +			continue;
> +		}
> +	}
> +}
> +
>  #endif /* _LINUX_GENHD_H */
> 



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/