[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130220214816.GC2928@two.firstfloor.org>
Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2013 22:48:16 +0100
From: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
To: Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>
Cc: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
Corey Ashford <cjashfor@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf x86: Change SandyBridge and IvyBrige instructions
event to be precise
> I don't think it buys you much. People read too much into what
> PEBS gives you. I can show you examples where PEBS
> is worse than no PEBS.
Nothing is perfect in sampling, but the precise instructions event
is definitely better in a range of situations. It avoids
a lot of shadow effects.
I think it's a good choice for a lot of situations, although
on Ivy Bridge without EventingRip the BB walking is still
fairly expensive.
It would be a good default for the "user only asks for instructions
for sampling and nothing else" situation, especially on Haswell
which has EventingRip. But that's not straight forward to detect.
-Andi
--
ak@...ux.intel.com -- Speaking for myself only.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists