[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20130220135830.1a290e0f.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2013 13:58:30 -0800
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
Cc: torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, jkosina@...e.cz,
keyrings@...ux-nfs.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] KEYS: Revert one application of "Fix unreachable code"
patch
On Wed, 20 Feb 2013 12:24:32 +0000
David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com> wrote:
> A patch to fix some unreachable code in search_my_process_keyrings() got
> applied twice by two different routes upstream:
>
> commit e67eab39bee26f509d38d00ca1a8f24b63f46a31
> Author: Alan Cox <alan@...ux.intel.com>
> Date: Thu Dec 20 15:05:54 2012 -0800
> keys: fix unreachable code
>
> and:
>
> commit b010520ab3d2c05eb444ed5e01fe6c33842f597a
> Author: Alan Cox <alan@...ux.intel.com>
> Date: Thu Oct 25 15:23:35 2012 +0100
> keys: Fix unreachable code
>
> Unfortunately, the second application removed something it shouldn't have and
> this wasn't detected by GIT. This is due to the patch not having sufficient
> lines of context to distinguish the two places of application.
>
> So revert the second application of the patch.
The runtime effects of this aren't described, so I don't know whether
the omission of cc:stable was deliberate :(
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists