linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] posix-timer: don't call idr

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 20 Feb 2013 14:20:04 -0800
From:	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To:	Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@...cle.com>
Cc:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] posix-timer: don't call idr_find() w/ negative ID

On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 2:15 PM, Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@...cle.com> wrote:
> Why can the timer be negative in the first place though? Why isn't the timer
> defined as an 'unsigned int' instead of an 'int' so that all values of timer
> would be legitimate?

No idea but it's userland visible thing. No point in arguing about it.

Thanks.

-- 
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/