[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <51255329.4070506@zytor.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2013 14:50:17 -0800
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To: Alessandro Rubini <rubini@...dd.com>
CC: linux@....linux.org.uk, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
giancarlo.asnaghi@...com, ciminaghi@...dd.com,
alan@...ux.intel.com, tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com,
x86@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V5 4/5] drivers/amba: add support for a PCI bridge
On 02/20/2013 02:45 PM, Alessandro Rubini wrote:
> [meanwhile I posted V6 with the acked-by of linusw and others, that
> were missing in V5]
>
> rmk:
>>> I'm happy to take it through my tree if everyone is now happy with this.
>
> hpa:
>> I am okay with that, although I would like to make sure we do a bunch of
>> x86 randconfigs on it before pushing it to Linus.
>
> I did like this:
> - disable STA2X11 (and thus AMBA) and build
> - enable STA2X11, answer y to all new questions and build
>
> So there's nothing left (you'll have two unrelated warnings, that I'm
> working on and I'll post a fix tomorrow). Sure, Peter, first time I
> didn't do that test and missed some of the drivers.
>
I was just concerned that rmk wouldn't necessarily do those tests as a
matter of process.
So Russell -- how do you want to handle this? Should I take them (and
ask Ingo to put them through his test machinery) or do you want to (and
run x86 randconfigs as part of your testing)?
-hpa
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists