lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3598cf904e2e235bc9060aa712dcce53@visp.net.lb>
Date:	Thu, 21 Feb 2013 01:24:02 +0200
From:	Denys Fedoryshchenko <denys@...p.net.lb>
To:	Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>
Cc:	<netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <pablo@...filter.org>,
	<jhs@...atatu.com>, <davem@...emloft.net>,
	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: netlink, RTM_NEWTCLASS, nested attributes

On 2013-02-21 01:21, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> On Tue, 19 Feb 2013 23:45:25 +0200
> Denys Fedoryshchenko <denys@...p.net.lb> wrote:
>
>> Hi
>>
>> I tried recently to write my own tool based on amazing libmnl (which
>> makes understanding of netlink - easy), written
>> by Pablo Neira Ayuso, to manage QoS in Linux and faced problem, 
>> which i
>> think probably
>> a bug in handling netlink messages in kernel.
>>
>> For example if i send message, RTM_NEWTCLASS, after attribute
>> TCA_OPTIONS i have nested attributes,
>> for example in HTB: TCA_HTB_PARMS, TCA_HTB_RTAB, TCA_HTB_CTAB.
>> libmnl, if i use nested attribute, adding a bit to it, by OR -
>> NLA_F_NESTED(1 << 15).
>> If i remove this flag - everything works fine. And here is the case,
>> iproute2 tools
>> just update length of TCA_OPTIONS, without setting flag, and it 
>> works
>> because of that fine too.
>>
>> So there is basically 3 solutions:
>> 1)New function in libmnl to do nested attributes without setting by 
>> OR
>> flag
>> 2)AND-ing attribute type in kernel to ignore nested flag
>> 3)Keeping as is, who cares?
>>
>
> Several legacy netlink interfaces don't use NESTED flag. These are by
> now enshrined in ABI and can't change. In code, that uses libmnl, I 
> just
> manually clear the flag as needed and document why. This could
> be added to libmnl.

Thank you for clarification!

---
Denys Fedoryshchenko, Network Engineer, Virtual ISP S.A.L.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ