[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.02.1302191902470.18957@chino.kir.corp.google.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2013 19:04:35 -0800 (PST)
From: David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
To: li guang <lig.fnst@...fujitsu.com>
cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
x86@...nel.org, isimatu.yasuaki@...fujitsu.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/4] acpi: move x86/mm/srat.c to
x86/kernel/acpi/srat.c
On Wed, 20 Feb 2013, li guang wrote:
> > > No, it doesn't. From next-20130219, you're missing at least two patches:
> > >
> > > 3795e4893203 ("acpi, memory-hotplug: extend movablemem_map ranges to the end of node")
> > > 9a561f4dfd70 ("acpi, memory-hotplug: support getting hotplug info from SRAT")
> > >
> > > I'm trying to be patient in reviewing your patches, but please double
> > > check your work.
> >
> > I have to say my latest pull has these commit, and can apply
> > successfully.
> > really don't know why you can't apply.
You should not be pulling linux-next, you should be fetching.
>
> I mean although my patches did not based on latest linux-next(miss
> several commits), but as I can see, they can be applied to latest
> linux-next (tag next-20130218) successfully.
>
next-20130218 is not the latest linux-next as I've already said. Do this:
go to
http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next-history.git;a=blob_plain;f=arch/x86/mm/srat.c;hb=HEAD
and search for handle_movablemem(). That's one of the functions added in
one of the commits I mentioned and was from February. Now search your
patch for handle_movablemem(). See a problem?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists