linux-kernel - Re: [ 0/1] 3.4.33-stable review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAKocOOP4cBit5NOZzu3gyij7-xfODVP8wZ+qEAjA3gDNEObXHw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Tue, 19 Feb 2013 20:31:02 -0700
From:	Shuah Khan <shuahkhan@...il.com>
To:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [ 0/1] 3.4.33-stable review

On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 7:51 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman
<gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 07:50:16PM -0700, Shuah Khan wrote:
>> On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 11:24 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman
>> <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
>> > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.4.33 release.
>> > There is 1 patch in this series, which will be posted as a response to
>> > this one.  If anyone has any issues with it being applied, please let me
>> > know.
>> >
>> > Responses should be made by Wed Feb 20 18:13:44 UTC 2013.
>> > Anything received after that time might be too late.
>> >
>> > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
>> >         kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v3.0/stable-review/patch-3.4.33-rc1.gz
>> > and the diffstat can be found below.
>> >
>> > thanks,
>> >
>> > greg k-h
>> >
>> > -------------
>>
>> Patches applied cleanly to 3.0.65, and 3.4.32
>> Compiled and booted on the following systems:
>> HP EliteBook 6930p Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Duo CPU T9400 @ 2.53GHz
>> HP ProBook 6475b AMD A10-4600M APU with Radeon(tm) HD Graphics
>>
>> Reviewed patches
>>
>> Skipped Cross-compile tests
>
> Thanks for testing, your kernel log messages looked correct, right?
>
> greg k-h

Yes, should have mentioned that I checked dmesg and syslog both and
compared dmesg
with the old dmesg I saved from the previous rc-1 testing for each of
these releases. Didn't
see anything that jumped out at me. I usually save dmesg from rc
cycles to look for regressions
if any from one rc cycle to the next.

-- Shuah
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/