lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1361404583-5557-1-git-send-email-nzimmer@sgi.com>
Date:	Wed, 20 Feb 2013 17:56:21 -0600
From:	Nathan Zimmer <nzimmer@....com>
To:	viresh.kumar@...aro.org, rjw@...k.pl
Cc:	cpufreq@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Nathan Zimmer <nzimmer@....com>
Subject: [PATCH v3 0/2] cpufreq: cpufreq_driver_lock is hot on large systems

I am noticing the cpufreq_driver_lock is quite hot.
On an idle 512 system perf shows me most of the system time is spent on this
lock.  This is quite significant as top shows 5% of time in system time.
My solution was to first convert the lock to a rwlock and then to the rcu.

v2: Rebase

v3: Read the RCU documentation instead of skimming it.  Also I based on 
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rafael/linux-pm.git pm+acpi-3.9-rc1
I assumed that was what you would prefer Rafael.

Nathan Zimmer (2):
  cpufreq: Convert the cpufreq_driver_lock to a rwlock
  cpufreq: Convert the cpufreq_driver_lock to use the rcu

 drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c | 286 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------
 1 file changed, 211 insertions(+), 75 deletions(-)

-- 
1.8.1.2

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ