lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LNX.2.00.1302210019390.17843@eggly.anvils>
Date:	Thu, 21 Feb 2013 00:20:48 -0800 (PST)
From:	Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>
To:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
cc:	Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>, Petr Holasek <pholasek@...hat.com>,
	Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
	Izik Eidus <izik.eidus@...ellosystems.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: [PATCH 2/7] ksm: treat unstable nid like in stable tree

An inconsistency emerged in reviewing the NUMA node changes to KSM:
when meeting a page from the wrong NUMA node in a stable tree, we say
that it's okay for comparisons, but not as a leaf for merging; whereas
when meeting a page from the wrong NUMA node in an unstable tree, we
bail out immediately.

Now, it might be that a wrong NUMA node in an unstable tree is more
likely to correlate with instablility (different content, with rbnode
now misplaced) than page migration; but even so, we are accustomed to
instablility in the unstable tree.

Without strong evidence for which strategy is generally better, I'd
rather be consistent with what's done in the stable tree: accept a page
from the wrong NUMA node for comparison, but not as a leaf for merging.

Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>
---
 mm/ksm.c |   19 +++++++++----------
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

--- mmotm.orig/mm/ksm.c	2013-02-20 22:28:23.584001392 -0800
+++ mmotm/mm/ksm.c	2013-02-20 22:28:27.288001480 -0800
@@ -1340,16 +1340,6 @@ struct rmap_item *unstable_tree_search_i
 			return NULL;
 		}
 
-		/*
-		 * If tree_page has been migrated to another NUMA node, it
-		 * will be flushed out and put into the right unstable tree
-		 * next time: only merge with it if merge_across_nodes.
-		 */
-		if (!ksm_merge_across_nodes && page_to_nid(tree_page) != nid) {
-			put_page(tree_page);
-			return NULL;
-		}
-
 		ret = memcmp_pages(page, tree_page);
 
 		parent = *new;
@@ -1359,6 +1349,15 @@ struct rmap_item *unstable_tree_search_i
 		} else if (ret > 0) {
 			put_page(tree_page);
 			new = &parent->rb_right;
+		} else if (!ksm_merge_across_nodes &&
+			   page_to_nid(tree_page) != nid) {
+			/*
+			 * If tree_page has been migrated to another NUMA node,
+			 * it will be flushed out and put in the right unstable
+			 * tree next time: only merge with it when across_nodes.
+			 */
+			put_page(tree_page);
+			return NULL;
 		} else {
 			*tree_pagep = tree_page;
 			return tree_rmap_item;
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ