[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5125EAB1.9070002@panasas.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2013 11:36:49 +0200
From: Boaz Harrosh <bharrosh@...asas.com>
To: "Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@...cle.com>
CC: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, <axboe@...nel.dk>,
<lucho@...kov.net>, <jack@...e.cz>, <ericvh@...il.com>,
<viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>, <rminnich@...dia.gov>, <tytso@....edu>,
<martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind1@...il.com>, <neilb@...e.de>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>, <david@...morbit.com>,
<gnehzuil.liu@...il.com>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<hch@...radead.org>, <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
<adilger.kernel@...ger.ca>, <jlayton@...ba.org>,
<linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org>, <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>,
<hirofumi@...l.parknet.co.jp>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/6] ubifs: Wait for page writeback to provide stable
pages
On 02/21/2013 05:48 AM, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 01:43:12PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
>> On Fri, 18 Jan 2013 17:13:16 -0800
>> "Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@...cle.com> wrote:
>>
>>> When stable pages are required, we have to wait if the page is just
>>> going to disk and we want to modify it. Add proper callback to
>>> ubifs_vm_page_mkwrite().
>>>
>>> CC: Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind1@...il.com>
>>> CC: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>
>>> CC: linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org
>>> From: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
>>> Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
>>> Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@...cle.com>
>>
>> A couple of these patches had this From:Jan strangely embedded in the
>> signoff area. I have assumed that they were indeed authored by Jan.
>>
>> Please note that authorship is indicated by putting the From: line
>> right at the start of the chagnelog.
>>
>>
>> I grabbed the patches. They should appear in linux-next tomorrow if I
>> can get the current pooppile to build.
>
> Well... these patches have been banging around in -next for a month or so now.
> As far as I know there haven't been any complaints. Can we push these for 3.9?
>
Yes, please I'm waiting for these patches as well. Lets push them this merge
window. I was sure they would get in at 3.8, but they didn't. What's the delay?
[Using this I can fix a theoretical raid corruption in exofs local access, which
no one really cared because exofs is always accessed via pnfs, which does not
have that bug]
Thanks
Boaz
> --D
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists