[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CABPqkBSDma_=MGWAcG_6d04r_7XOxxjRg3ju69Oz8OFzKcDXxA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2013 11:35:17 +0100
From: Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>
To: Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
"mingo@...e.hu" <mingo@...e.hu>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung.kim@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf, x86: add Intel IvyBridge event scheduling constraints
On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 11:08 PM, Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
>> > Except for LDM_PENDING the CYCLE_ACTIVITY events have been also added to Sandy Bridge.
>> > So it should be also added there.
>> >
>> As far as I know and I double-checked the documentation I have, there
>> is no CYCLE_ACTIVITY
>> event on SNB or SNB-EP.
>
> page 19-28 in the Jan 2013 SDM. It was only recently added.
> It's only a subset of what you have on Ivy Bridge.
>
I have confirmed that this is a typo in the SDM. This event is not
available on SandyBridge.
>>
>> > In fact I think you can still share the table because it would just add some
>> > non existent events to Sandy Bridge, which is a noop.
>> >
>> I don't see the point of this, except saving a few bytes. Isn't it
>> better to keep each PMU separate?
>
> Ok, as long as you update the SNB table too.
>
> -Andi
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists