[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5125FC75.3000301@ahsoftware.de>
Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2013 11:52:37 +0100
From: Alexander Holler <holler@...oftware.de>
To: Benjamin Tissoires <benjamin.tissoires@...il.com>
CC: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>,
linux-input@...r.kernel.org, srinivas.pandruvada@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] HID: sensor-hub: don't limit the driver only to USB
bus
Am 21.02.2013 11:34, schrieb Benjamin Tissoires:
> Hi,
>
> Sorry for coming this late in the discussion (I was sick at the
> beginning of the week, preventing me to answer mails).
>
> On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 1:13 PM, Alexander Holler <holler@...oftware.de> wrote:
>>>>>>>> Hmm, what happens with Bluetooth sensor-hubs? Is the driver now able
>>>>>>>> to handle them too?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> It should, yes.
>>>>>>
>
> It should, but the full features are not enabled. We also need to
> patch hidp so that it can handle .request() too. Otherwise, when the
> sensor hub will request a "get feature" or a "set feature", then
> nothing will be triggered.
>
> However, I don't think it will prevent us from removing the test
> against USB/I2C. It's just something we need to work on too.
Thanks. I've just ordered me one of those bt-sensors from TI, maybe I
will be able to make it HID over GATT aware to play a bit with it. The
BT spec for HID over GATT doesn't talk about sensors, but if I will find
a way to program the device without buying more hw, I will have a look
if it is possible. ;)
Regards,
Alexander
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists