[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <512640DE.4050201@parallels.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2013 19:44:30 +0400
From: Glauber Costa <glommer@...allels.com>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
CC: <containers@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.cz>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
Steffen Michalke <StMichalke@....de>
Subject: Re: PROBLEM: Crash cgdeleting empty memory cgroups with memory.kmem.limit_in_bytes
set
On 02/21/2013 03:22 PM, Glauber Costa wrote:
> On 02/21/2013 03:00 AM, Tejun Heo wrote:
>> (cc'ing cgroup / memcg people and quoting whole body)
>>
>> Looks like something is going wrong with memcg cache destruction.
>> Glauber, any ideas? Also, can we please not use names as generic as
>> kmem_cache_destroy_work_func for something specific to memcg? How
>> about something like memcg_destroy_cache_workfn?
>>
>> Thanks.
>
> Steffen,
>
> Is there any chance you could test that using SLAB instead of SLUB?
> I haven't manage to reproduce it yet, but I am working on some theories
> about why this is happening. If I could at least know if this is likely
> a cache problem vs a inner-memcg problem, that would help. The calltrace
> is not incredibly helpful, but it does indicate that the problem happens
> when freeing cache objects.
>
Update:
I've already reproduced this and determined this is a problem that
plagues slub only, most likely due to initialization of the node caches.
But I still don't know for sure the exact location. Expect a patch by
tomorrow.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists