[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130221130125.7f649d4c@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2013 13:01:25 -0300
From: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...hat.com>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
Cc: Linux Edac Mailing List <linux-edac@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH EDACv2 01/12] edac: add support for raw error reports
Em Thu, 21 Feb 2013 16:53:37 +0100
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de> escreveu:
> On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 12:38:59PM -0300, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> > That allows APEI GHES driver to report errors directly, using
> > the EDAC error report API.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...hat.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/edac/edac_core.h | 17 ++++++++
> > drivers/edac/edac_mc.c | 109 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
> > 2 files changed, 100 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/edac/edac_core.h b/drivers/edac/edac_core.h
> > index 23bb99f..9c5da11 100644
> > --- a/drivers/edac/edac_core.h
> > +++ b/drivers/edac/edac_core.h
> > @@ -453,6 +453,23 @@ extern struct mem_ctl_info *find_mci_by_dev(struct device *dev);
> > extern struct mem_ctl_info *edac_mc_del_mc(struct device *dev);
> > extern int edac_mc_find_csrow_by_page(struct mem_ctl_info *mci,
> > unsigned long page);
> > +
> > +void edac_raw_mc_handle_error(const enum hw_event_mc_err_type type,
> > + struct mem_ctl_info *mci,
> > + long grain,
> > + const u16 error_count,
> > + const int top_layer,
> > + const int mid_layer,
> > + const int low_layer,
> > + const unsigned long page_frame_number,
> > + const unsigned long offset_in_page,
> > + const unsigned long syndrome,
> > + const char *msg,
> > + const char *location,
> > + const char *label,
> > + const char *other_detail,
> > + const bool enable_per_layer_report);
>
> Why not merge this patch with 10/12?
>
> You're adding edac_raw_mc_handle_error here and rewriting it in 10/12.
> This looks like unnecessary churn to me.
I did this way to to follow the "one patch per logical change rule".
The rationale for this patch is to allow doing raw error reports,
as needed by changeset 06/12.
The rationale for 10/12 was to reduce the stack pressure. While
10/12 touches on the above routine, it's main focus is to fix a
previous fixup of using a large space inside the stack during the
memory report preparation.
Regards,
Mauro
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists