linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH EDACv2 01/12] edac: add support for raw error reports

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20130221180312.GI4694@pd.tnic>
Date:	Thu, 21 Feb 2013 19:03:12 +0100
From:	Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To:	Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...hat.com>
Cc:	Linux Edac Mailing List <linux-edac@...r.kernel.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH EDACv2 01/12] edac: add support for raw error reports

On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 02:47:59PM -0300, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> Em Thu, 21 Feb 2013 17:08:21 +0100
> Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de> escreveu:
> 
> > On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 01:01:25PM -0300, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> > > I did this way to to follow the "one patch per logical change rule".
> > > The rationale for this patch is to allow doing raw error reports,
> > > as needed by changeset 06/12.
> > 
> > Right, but you're adding a new function so why not add the right version
> > from the get-go? Otherwise the rule above would apply but not for new
> > code, right?
> 
> The rule also applies for both patches.
> 
> Except for making everybody's looking on this code to re-read all patches 
> and for me to rebase it again, I can't see any difference between what I
> posted and your proposal to move patch 10 to the beginning of the changeset.
> 
> Anyway, I did it at this separate branch, in order to preserve the previous
> ghes_v2 (also at the same repository):
> 	http://git.infradead.org/users/mchehab/edac.git/shortlog/refs/heads/ghes_v3
> 
> Patch 10/12 is now the first patch, and became this one:
> 	http://git.infradead.org/users/mchehab/edac.git/commit/c7ef7645544131b0750478d1cf94cdfa945c809d
> 
> Patch 01/12 is now the second one:
> 	http://git.infradead.org/users/mchehab/edac.git/commit/e7e248304c8ccf02b89e04c3b3b66006b993b5a7
> 
> Obviously, the ghes_edac part of 10/12 got fold into this patch:
> 	http://git.infradead.org/users/mchehab/edac.git/commit/bf45061af29e585506e8d3bfcda2f2b1e557281c
> 
> And a couple other patches got side-affected by this change with trivial
> conflicts (patches 9/12 and 11/12). Except for this change, v2 and v3 are 
> identical, so I won't re-post it.

Yep, looks good at a quick glance.

Thanks.

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

Sent from a fat crate under my desk. Formatting is fine.
--
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/