lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <51266897.9070308@linaro.org>
Date:	Thu, 21 Feb 2013 10:33:59 -0800
From:	John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>
To:	Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@...sung.com>,
	Andrzej Pietrasiewicz <andrzej.p@...sung.com>
CC:	Sachin Kamat <sachin.kamat@...aro.org>,
	Tushar Behera <tushar.behera@...aro.org>,
	lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: Origen board hang with functionfs

On 02/20/2013 06:01 PM, John Stultz wrote:
> Hey Kukjin, Andrzej,
>     I recently started playing around with functionfs, and have 
> noticed some strange behavior with my origen board.
>
> If I enable the FunctionFS gadget driver, I see the board hang at boot 
> here:
>
> [    2.360000] USB Mass Storage support registered.
> [    2.365000] s3c-hsotg s3c-hsotg: regs f0040000, irq 103
> [    2.375000] s3c-hsotg s3c-hsotg: EPs:15
> [    2.380000] s3c-hsotg s3c-hsotg: dedicated fifos
> [    2.385000] g_ffs: file system registered
> [    2.390000] mousedev: PS/2 mouse device common for all mice
> [    2.395000] s5p-fimc exynos4-fimc.0: start latency exceeded, new 
> value 792 ns
> [    2.400000] s5p-fimc exynos4-fimc.0: state restore latency 
> exceeded, new vals
> [    2.410000] s5p-fimc exynos4-fimc.0: stop latency exceeded, new 
> value 667 ns
> [    2.420000] s5p-fimc exynos4-fimc.0: state save latency exceeded, 
> new value s
> [    2.425000] s5p-fimc exynos4-fimc.1: start latency exceeded, new 
> value 625 ns
> [    2.435000] s5p-fimc exynos4-fimc.1: state restore latency 
> exceeded, new vals
> [    2.440000] s5p-fimc exynos4-fimc.1: stop latency exceeded, new 
> value 750 ns
> [    2.450000] s5p-fimc exynos4-fimc.1: start latency exceeded, new 
> value 667 ns
> [    2.455000] s5p-fimc exynos4-fimc.1: state save latency exceeded, 
> new value s
>
>
> And it gets no further. Trying to send a sysrq-t (or anything after a 
> break) doesn't seem to do anything either.
>
> Trying to debug this a bit more, I added "initcall_debug 
> ignore_loglevel" to the boot arguments, but strangely, that allows it 
> to boot and everything seems to be fine. I added a number of printks 
> to the g_ffs driver, but it doesn't seem like the hang is happening in 
> that code (though de-configuring it does avoid the issue - so maybe 
> not?).

So I also enabled lockdep to see if it might show a locking problem even 
when initcall_debug avoids the race. Unfortunately nothing shows up at 
boot, but when I try to use FunctionFS I got the following lockdep 
splat, which then triggered a warning and then finally an oops all in 
succession.

The core lockdep parts are below, and the full log is attached. (Sorry 
its cropped at 80 lines, I wasn't logging my screen session at the time, 
so its all copy-pasted. Let me know if you'd need me to recreate the 
problem.)


[  109.290000] =========================================================
[  109.295000] [ INFO: possible irq lock inversion dependency detected ]
[  109.305000] 3.8.0-dirty #199 Not tainted
[  109.310000] ---------------------------------------------------------
[  109.315000] swapper/0/0 just changed the state of lock:
[  109.320000]  (&(&hsotg->lock)->rlock){-.....}, at: [<c029d35c>] 
s3c_hsotg_ir8
[  109.325000] but this lock took another, HARDIRQ-unsafe lock in the past:
[  109.335000]  (clocks_mutex){+.+...}

and interrupts could create inverse lock ordering between them.

[  109.345000]
[  109.345000] other info that might help us debug this:
[  109.350000]  Possible interrupt unsafe locking scenario:
[  109.350000]
[  109.355000]        CPU0                    CPU1
[  109.360000]        ----                    ----
[  109.365000]   lock(clocks_mutex);
[  109.370000]                                local_irq_disable();
[  109.375000] lock(&(&hsotg->lock)->rlock);
[  109.380000]                                lock(clocks_mutex);
[  109.390000]   <Interrupt>
[  109.390000]     lock(&(&hsotg->lock)->rlock);
[  109.395000]
[  109.395000]  *** DEADLOCK ***
[  109.395000]
[  109.400000] no locks held by swapper/0/0.
[  109.405000]
[  109.405000] the shortest dependencies between 2nd lock and 1st lock:
[  109.410000]  -> (clocks_mutex){+.+...} ops: 221 {
[  109.415000]     HARDIRQ-ON-W at:
[  109.420000]                       [<c0064b08>] __lock_acquire+0x560/0xa94
[  109.425000]                       [<c0066684>] lock_acquire+0x60/0x74
[  109.435000]                       [<c045b010>] 
mutex_lock_nested+0x54/0x3a8
[  109.440000]                       [<c0310888>] clk_get_sys+0x24/0xf4
[  109.445000]                       [<c059994c>] 
exynos_pm_drvinit+0x2c/0x64
[  109.455000]                       [<c05918e0>] do_one_initcall+0x50/0x164
[  109.460000]                       [<c0591b0c>] 
kernel_init_freeable+0x118/0xc
[  109.470000]                       [<c0451494>] kernel_init+0x8/0xe4
[  109.475000]                       [<c000e1b0>] ret_from_fork+0x14/0x24
[  109.480000]     SOFTIRQ-ON-W at:
[  109.485000]                       [<c0064b2c>] __lock_acquire+0x584/0xa94
[  109.490000]                       [<c0066684>] lock_acquire+0x60/0x74
[  109.495000]                       [<c045b010>] 
mutex_lock_nested+0x54/0x3a8
[  109.505000]                       [<c0310888>] clk_get_sys+0x24/0xf4
[  109.510000]                       [<c059994c>] 
exynos_pm_drvinit+0x2c/0x64
[  109.515000]                       [<c05918e0>] do_one_initcall+0x50/0x164
[  109.525000]                       [<c0591b0c>] 
kernel_init_freeable+0x118/0xc
[  109.530000]                       [<c0451494>] kernel_init+0x8/0xe4
[  109.535000]                       [<c000e1b0>] ret_from_fork+0x14/0x24
[  109.545000]     INITIAL USE at:
[  109.545000]                      [<c0064840>] __lock_acquire+0x298/0xa94
[  109.555000]                      [<c0066684>] lock_acquire+0x60/0x74
[  109.560000]                      [<c045b010>] 
mutex_lock_nested+0x54/0x3a8
[  109.565000]                      [<c0310998>] clkdev_add+0x1c/0x3c
[  109.575000]                      [<c001fcd4>] 
s3c24xx_register_clock+0x34/0x0
[  109.580000]                      [<c059b3b0>] 
s3c24xx_register_baseclocks+0x4
[  109.590000]                      [<c0598d1c>] 
exynos4_init_clocks+0x1c/0x80
[  109.595000]                      [<c059ae00>] 
s3c24xx_init_clocks+0x44/0x54
[  109.600000]                      [<c059a848>] origen_map_io+0x1c/0x34
[  109.610000]                      [<c0597d6c>] paging_init+0x5ec/0x798
[  109.615000]                      [<c0594c00>] setup_arch+0x3c8/0x65c
[  109.620000]                      [<c0591588>] start_kernel+0x7c/0x384
[  109.625000]                      [<40008078>] 0x40008078
[  109.630000]   }

View attachment "g_ffs-s3c-clock-potential-deadlock.txt" of type "text/plain" (15683 bytes)

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ