[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20130221141841.c760b02f.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2013 14:18:41 -0800
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...nvz.org>
Cc: Amnon Shiloh <u3557@...o.sublimeip.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>, u3557@...lix.com.au,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
Pedro Alves <palves@...hat.com>,
Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@...hat.com>,
Jan Kratochvil <jan.kratochvil@...hat.com>,
Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@...allels.com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: prctl(PR_SET_MM)
On Thu, 21 Feb 2013 12:00:28 +0400
Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...nvz.org> wrote:
> From: Amnon Shiloh <u3557@...o.sublimeip.com>
> Subject: prctl: Make PR_SET_MM being depend on own CONFIG_MM_FIELDS_SETTING
>
> ...
>
> Signed-off-by: Amnon Shiloh <u3557@...o.sublimeip.com>
The "..." makes me sad.
If/when this patch gets sent for real, please explain the reasons?
AFAICT it permits the enabling of prctl(PR_SET_MM) in
CONFIG_CHECKPOINT_RESTORE=n kernels. If that was indeed the intent,
why?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists