[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20130222101359.0c91a7259f648a3d06221bd8@canb.auug.org.au>
Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2013 10:13:59 +1100
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To: Vineet Gupta <Vineet.Gupta1@...opsys.com>
Cc: James Hogan <james.hogan@...tec.com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, <arm@...nel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
<linux-next@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/11] ARM: disable virt_to_bus/virt_to_bus almost
everywhere
Hi,
On Thu, 21 Feb 2013 13:07:56 +0530 Vineet Gupta <Vineet.Gupta1@...opsys.com> wrote:
>
> >> I guess you'll have to do something similar for arch/metag, and Vineet
> >> will do it for arch/arc.
>
> After getting the tip-bot msg about Stephen's patch for -mm, I never saw it in
> -next and thus was not sure how when it will start showing up in -next.
It arrived in next-21030220.
> >> Stephen's patch is currently in Andrew's tree, and I don't see an easy
> >> way to coordinate this. The patch we will need once both are merged
> >> is below.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
> >
> > FWIW:
> > Acked-by: James Hogan <james.hogan@...tec.com> (for arch/metag)
> >
> Acked-by: Vineet Gupta <vgupta@...opsys.com> (for arch/arc)
>
> So this means Stephen's patch - once merged will take care of existing in-tree
> arches and your's will take care of metag/arc.
The easiest way would be to put the follow up patches in Andrew's patch
set (since it is still based on top of linux-next). It usually is merged
pretty late, so I would get your own trees merged ASAP and this can be
taken care of when Andrew sends his patch set to Linus.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell sfr@...b.auug.org.au
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists