linux-kernel - Re: [PATCHv2 vringh 1/3] remoteproc: Add support for vringh (Host vrings)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 21 Feb 2013 17:07:29 +1030
From:	Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
To:	Ohad Ben-Cohen <ohad@...ery.com>,
	Sjur Brændeland <sjur.brandeland@...ricsson.com>
Cc:	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Sjur Brændeland 
	<sjur@...ndeland.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	virtualization <virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
	"linux-kernel\@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Dmitry Tarnyagin <dmitry.tarnyagin@...ricsson.com>,
	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
	Erwan Yvin <erwan.yvin@...ricsson.com>,
	Ido Yariv <ido@...ery.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 vringh 1/3] remoteproc: Add support for vringh (Host vrings)

Ohad Ben-Cohen <ohad@...ery.com> writes:
> Hi Sjur,
>
> On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 1:49 PM,  <sjur.brandeland@...ricsson.com> wrote:
>> From: Sjur Brændeland <sjur.brandeland@...ricsson.com>
>>
>> Add functions for creating, deleting and kicking host-side virtio rings.
>>
>> The host ring is not integrated with virtiqueues and cannot be managed
>> through virtio-config.
>
> Is that an inherent design/issue of vringh or just a description of
> the current vringh code ?

It's by design.  The producer (virtqueue) and consumer (vringh) are two
sides of the same coin, but they do different things.

virtqueue is a slightly higher level abstraction which assumes a
virtio_device, because every user so far has had one.  vringh doesn't,
because it's also aimed to underlie vhost.c which doesn't really have
one.

> This is possible of course thanks to the abstraction provided by
> virtio: remoteproc only implements a set of callbacks which virtio
> invokes when needed.
>
> Do we not want to follow a similar design scheme with vringh ?

Hmm... I clearly jumped the gun, assuming consensus was already reached.
I have put these patches *back* into pending-rebases, and they will not
be merged this merge window.

Cheers,
Rusty.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/