[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1361513971.5817.72.camel@marge.simpson.net>
Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2013 07:19:31 +0100
From: Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>
To: Michael Wang <wangyun@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Paul Turner <pjt@...gle.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, alex.shi@...el.com,
Ram Pai <linuxram@...ibm.com>,
"Nikunj A. Dadhania" <nikunj@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v3 0/3] sched: simplify the select_task_rq_fair()
On Fri, 2013-02-22 at 14:06 +0800, Michael Wang wrote:
> On 02/22/2013 01:08 PM, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> > On Fri, 2013-02-22 at 10:37 +0800, Michael Wang wrote:
> >
> >> According to the testing result, I could not agree this purpose of
> >> wake_affine() benefit us, but I'm sure that wake_affine() is a terrible
> >> performance killer when system is busy.
> >
> > (hm, result is singular.. pgbench in 1:N mode only?)
>
> I'm not sure about how pgbench implemented, all I know is it will create
> several instance and access the database, I suppose no different from
> several threads access database (1 server and N clients?).
It's user switchable.
-Mike
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists