[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1361516478.223331042@f282.mail.ru>
Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2013 11:01:18 +0400
From: Alexander Shiyan <shc_work@...l.ru>
To: Dong Aisheng <b29396@...escale.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Dong Aisheng <dong.aisheng@...aro.org>,
Samuel Ortiz <sameo@...ux.intel.com>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Subject: Re[2]: [PATCH v4] mfd: syscon: Add non-DT support
> On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 07:29:02PM +0400, Alexander Shiyan wrote:
> > This patch allow using syscon driver from the platform data, i.e.
> > possibility using driver on systems without oftree support.
> > For search syscon device from the client drivers,
> > "syscon_regmap_lookup_by_pdevname" function was added.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Alexander Shiyan <shc_work@...l.ru>
>
> [...]
>
> > + syscon->base = devm_ioremap_resource(dev, res);
> > + if (!syscon->base)
>
> Is this correct?
Hmm, of course IS_ERR should be used here...
v5?
>
> > + return -EBUSY;
> >
>
> Otherwise, i'm also ok with this patch.
> Acked-by: Dong Aisheng <dong.aisheng@...aro.org>
>
> BTW, i did not see Samuel's tree having this new API.
> So, who will pick this patch?
I have same question.
---
Powered by blists - more mailing lists