[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1361521720.26546.93.camel@zakaz.uk.xensource.com>
Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2013 08:28:40 +0000
From: Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@...rix.com>
To: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@...e.com>
CC: Stefano Stabellini <Stefano.Stabellini@...citrix.com>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"xen-devel@...ts.xen.org" <xen-devel@...ts.xen.org>,
Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Keir (Xen.org)" <keir@....org>, "Tim (Xen.org)" <tim@....org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH XEN] xen: event channel arrays are xen_ulong_t and not
unsigned long
On Fri, 2013-02-22 at 08:12 +0000, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >>> On 21.02.13 at 18:16, Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@...rix.com> wrote:
> > On Tue, 2013-02-19 at 14:49 +0000, Ian Campbell wrote:
> >> On ARM we want these to be the same size on 32- and 64-bit.
> >>
> >> This is an ABI change on ARM. X86 does not change.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@...rix.com>
> >> Cc: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@...e.com>
> >> Cc: Keir (Xen.org) <keir@....org>
> >
> > Are you guys (un)happy with this change from the Xen & x86 side?
>
> I don't see any problem with it.
I'll take this as an Acked-by if that's ok with you.
Ian.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists