[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1361522767.26780.44.camel@laptop>
Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2013 09:46:07 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Kevin Hilman <khilman@...aro.org>
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Russell King <rmk+kernel@....linux.org.uk>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] cpustat: use atomic operations to read/update stats
On Thu, 2013-02-21 at 21:56 -0800, Kevin Hilman wrote:
> On 64-bit platforms, reads/writes of the various cpustat fields are
> atomic due to native 64-bit loads/stores. However, on non 64-bit
> platforms, reads/writes of the cpustat fields are not atomic and could
> lead to inconsistent statistics.
Which is a problem how?
> This problem was originally reported by Frederic Weisbecker as a
> 64-bit limitation with the nsec granularity cputime accounting for
> full dynticks, but then we realized that it's a problem that's been
> around for awhile and not specific to the new cputime accounting.
>
> This series fixes this by first converting all access to the cputime
> fields to use accessor functions, and then converting the accessor
> functions to use the atomic64 functions.
Argh!! at what cost? 64bit atomics are like expensive. Wouldn't adding
a seqlock be saner?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists