[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <51273609.9080308@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2013 17:10:33 +0800
From: Michael Wang <wangyun@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
CC: Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Paul Turner <pjt@...gle.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, alex.shi@...el.com,
Ram Pai <linuxram@...ibm.com>,
"Nikunj A. Dadhania" <nikunj@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v3 0/3] sched: simplify the select_task_rq_fair()
On 02/22/2013 04:21 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Fri, 2013-02-22 at 10:36 +0800, Michael Wang wrote:
>> According to my understanding, in the old world, wake_affine() will
>> only
>> be used if curr_cpu and prev_cpu share cache, which means they are in
>> one package, whatever search in llc sd of curr_cpu or prev_cpu, we
>> won't
>> have the chance to spread the task out of that package.
>
> Nah, look at where SD_WAKE_AFFINE is set. Only 'remote/big' NUMA domains
> don't have it set, but 'small' NUMA systems will have it set over the
> entire domain tree.
Oh, I missed that point...
But I don't get the reason to make NUMA level affine, cpus in different
nodes share cache? doesn't make sense...
Regards,
Michael Wang
>
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists