| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2013 09:28:44 -0800 From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> To: William Dauchy <william@...di.net> Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org, Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>, "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, ian.campbell@...rix.com, david.vrabel@...rix.com, "Christopher S. Aker" <caker@...shore.net> Subject: Re: xen-netback fixes for stable 35876b5 3e55f8b On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 06:17:54PM +0100, William Dauchy wrote: > On Feb22 09:08, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > You mean 3.4 and newer, right? > > Are you sure that 3.2 and 3.0 aren't also relevant here? > > They are, but didn't test them directly. > I just applied them without trouble. What does that mean? Should they be applied for those kernels or not? confused, greg k-h -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists