[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130222182705.GC19527@mudshark.cambridge.arm.com>
Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2013 18:27:06 +0000
From: Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
To: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>
Cc: "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org" <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>,
Steve Muckle <smuckle@...eaurora.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: vfp: fix fpsid register subarchitecture field mask
width
Hi guys,
On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 08:08:05AM +0000, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> From: Steve Muckle <smuckle@...eaurora.org>
>
> The subarchitecture field in the fpsid register is 7 bits wide.
> The topmost bit is used to designate that the subarchitecture
> designer is not ARM. We use this field to determine which VFP
> version is supported by the CPU. Since the topmost bit is masked
> off we detect non-ARM subarchitectures as supporting only
> HWCAP_VFP and not HWCAP_VFPv3 as it should be for Qualcomm's
> processors.
I'm struggling to see why this has anything to do with the hwcaps being set
incorrectly. What value do you have in fpsid? As far as I can tell, the
subarchitecture bits 6:0 should start at 0x40 for you, right?
I can see cases for changing this code, I just don't see why it would go
wrong in the case you're describing.
Cheers,
Will
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists