[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAAmzW4OG6b+7t2S3PUY710CDHkbSb9BWxzxWULm5EzJP4BGEXA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 23 Feb 2013 08:20:15 +0900
From: JoonSoo Kim <js1304@...il.com>
To: Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>
Cc: Glauber Costa <glommer@...allels.com>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, cgroups@...r.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] slub: correctly bootstrap boot caches
2013/2/23 Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>:
> On Fri, 22 Feb 2013, Glauber Costa wrote:
>
>> On 02/22/2013 09:01 PM, Christoph Lameter wrote:
>> > Argh. This one was the final version:
>> >
>> > https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/2009521/
>> >
>>
>> It seems it would work. It is all the same to me.
>> Which one do you prefer?
>
> Flushing seems to be simpler and less code.
>
Hello, Christoph, Glauber.
With flushing, deactivate_slab() occur and it has some overhead to
deactivate objects.
If my patch properly fix this situation, it is better to use mine
which has no overhead.
Thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists