linux-kernel - Re: [patch 2/2] arm: Wire up kcmp syscall

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <201302232231.45972.arnd@arndb.de>
Date:	Sat, 23 Feb 2013 22:31:45 +0000
From:	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To:	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Cc:	Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...nvz.org>,
	Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>, xemul@...allels.com,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, ebiederm@...ssion.com, hpa@...or.com,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
	Alexander Kartashov <alekskartashov@...allels.com>
Subject: Re: [patch 2/2] arm: Wire up kcmp syscall

On Tuesday 19 February 2013, Cyrill Gorcunov wrote:
> From: Alexander Kartashov <alekskartashov@...allels.com>
> Subject: arm: Wire up kcmp syscall
> 
> Signed-off-by: Alexander Kartashov <alekskartashov@...allels.com>
> Cc: Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>

Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>

Looks uncontroversial since the number is already reserved and
there is a cond_syscall() line, which means it does not
even depend on patch 1.

Russell, are you picking this one up?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/