linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] cpufreq: Convert the cpufreq_driver

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAKohpo=unSqEUMgqYNS8qmqM3n2qKbx5x0r9_hF9gLrZ58zqqg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Sat, 23 Feb 2013 09:27:50 +0530
From:	Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
To:	Nathan Zimmer <nzimmer@....com>
Cc:	rjw@...k.pl, cpufreq@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] cpufreq: Convert the cpufreq_driver_lock to a rwlock

On 22 February 2013 21:54, Nathan Zimmer <nzimmer@....com> wrote:
> This eliminates the contention I am seeing in __cpufreq_cpu_get.
> It also nicely stages the lock to be replaced by the rcu.
>
> Cc: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
> Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
> Signed-off-by: Nathan Zimmer <nzimmer@....com>

Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>

@Rafael: I am too bored of seeing this patch again and again :)
Can we get this applied alone for now?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/