linux-kernel - Are there numa balancing topics scheduled for the incoming LSF?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAJd=RBBwwjiBcfCe5wMSS8Dzz1tF=EfGsGMggH+A174yTKa9PA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Sat, 23 Feb 2013 15:34:17 +0800
From:	Hillf Danton <dhillf@...il.com>
To:	Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>
Cc:	Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Are there numa balancing topics scheduled for the incoming LSF?

Hello all

On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 7:19 AM, Linus Torvalds
<torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 2:03 AM, Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de> wrote:
>> This is a pull request for "Automatic NUMA Balancing V11". The list
>
> Ok, guys, I've pulled this and pushed out. There were some conflicts
> with both the VM changes and with the scheduler tree, but they were
> pretty small and looked simple, so I fixed them up and hope they all
> work.
>
> Anyway, hopefully we'll have a more real numa balancing for 3.9, and
> this is still considered a reasonable base for that work.
>
And what is scheduled for 3.9?

Thanks
Hillf
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/