| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Sat, 23 Feb 2013 10:20:48 +0100 From: Christian Gmeiner <christian.gmeiner@...il.com> To: Bryan Wu <cooloney@...il.com> Cc: akpm <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, "linux-next@...r.kernel.org" <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, stable@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] leds-ot200: Fix misbehavior caused by wrong bit masks 2013/2/15 Bryan Wu <cooloney@...il.com>: > On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 7:58 AM, Christian Gmeiner > <christian.gmeiner@...il.com> wrote: >> During the development of this driver an in-house register >> documentation was used. The last weeks some integration tests >> were done and this problem was found. It turned out that >> the released register documentation is wrong. >> >> The fix is very simple: shift all masks by one. >> >> Our customers can control LEDs from userspace via Java, >> C++ or what every. They have running/working applications where >> they want to control led_3 but led_2 get's used. >> I got a bug report in our in-house bug tracker so it would be >> great to fix this upstream. >> >> Signed-off-by: Christian Gmeiner <christian.gmeiner@...il.com> > > Thanks, Christian. > > And Andrew, are you going to take care of this patch? Or I will merge this. > Whats the current state of the patch? Hope we can get it into 3.9 :) -- Christian Gmeiner, MSc -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists