linux-kernel - Re: WARNING: at drivers/pci/pci.c:1397 pci_disable

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <512B3B93.2050504@suse.cz>
Date:	Mon, 25 Feb 2013 11:23:15 +0100
From:	Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.cz>
To:	Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>
CC:	Konstantin Khlebnikov <khlebnikov@...nvz.org>,
	"Wysocki, Rafael J" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
	linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: WARNING: at drivers/pci/pci.c:1397 pci_disable_device

On 02/24/2013 10:28 PM, Jiri Slaby wrote:
> On 02/19/2013 07:53 PM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
>> On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 11:34 AM, Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.cz> wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> so I hit that one:
>>> +       dev_WARN_ONCE(&dev->dev, atomic_read(&dev->enable_cnt) <= 0,
>>> +                     "disabling already-disabled device");
>>>
>>> during suspend (to ram):
>>> WARNING: at drivers/pci/pci.c:1397 pci_disable_device+0x90/0xa0()
>>> Hardware name: To Be Filled By O.E.M.
>>> Device e1000e
>>> disabling already-disabled device
>>> Modules linked in: dvb_usb_dib0700 dib0090 dib7000p dib7000m dib0070
>>> dib8000 dib3000mc dibx000_common microcode
>>> Pid: 31027, comm: kworker/u:35 Not tainted 3.8.0-rc7-next-20130218_64+ #1768
>>> Call Trace:
>>>  [<ffffffff81313b00>] ? do_pci_disable_device+0x30/0x60
>>>  [<ffffffff8107f2ff>] warn_slowpath_common+0x7f/0xc0
>>>  [<ffffffff8107f3f6>] warn_slowpath_fmt+0x46/0x50
>>>  [<ffffffff81313bc0>] pci_disable_device+0x90/0xa0
>>>  [<ffffffff814c8152>] __e1000_shutdown+0x262/0x8b0
>>>  [<ffffffff814c8813>] e1000_suspend+0x23/0x50
>>>  [<ffffffff816be581>] ? wait_for_completion+0x31/0x100
>>>  [<ffffffff81316337>] pci_pm_suspend+0x77/0x140
>>>  [<ffffffff8144aa6a>] ? __pm_runtime_barrier+0x1a/0x130
>>>  [<ffffffff813162c0>] ? pci_pm_poweroff+0xf0/0xf0
>>>  [<ffffffff81447838>] dpm_run_callback+0x58/0x90
>>>  [<ffffffff8144795b>] __device_suspend+0xeb/0x280
>>>  [<ffffffff814482af>] async_suspend+0x1f/0xa0
>>>  [<ffffffff810a9c9b>] async_run_entry_fn+0x3b/0x140
>>>  [<ffffffff8109b9a4>] process_one_work+0x174/0x410
>>>  [<ffffffff8109d426>] worker_thread+0x116/0x400
>>>  [<ffffffff8109d310>] ? busy_worker_rebind_fn+0xc0/0xc0
>>>  [<ffffffff810a3340>] kthread+0xc0/0xd0
>>>  [<ffffffff810a3280>] ? kthread_create_on_node+0x130/0x130
>>>  [<ffffffff816c089c>] ret_from_fork+0x7c/0xb0
>>>  [<ffffffff810a3280>] ? kthread_create_on_node+0x130/0x130
>>> ---[ end trace 6c5060f8b8fb9175 ]---
>>> e1000e 0000:00:19.0: System wakeup enabled by ACPI
>>
>> I think Konstantin posted an e1000e patch that would fix this, but
>> it's going via the e1000e folks.  Hopefully both my tree and the
>> e1000e patch will be merged soon.
> 
> I'm using -next anyway, so is there any chance it is fixed there some
> time soon?

Nevermind, I've just applied "e1000e: fix pci-device enable-counter
balance" which should fix that, I suppose.

> thanks,
-- 
js
suse labs
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/