linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] cpufreq: highbank: do not initialize array with a loop

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 25 Feb 2013 07:53:47 -0600
From:	Mark Langsdorf <mark.langsdorf@...xeda.com>
To:	Emilio López <emilio@...pez.com.ar>
CC:	"viresh.kumar@...aro.org" <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>,
	"rjw@...k.pl" <rjw@...k.pl>,
	"shawn.guo@...aro.org" <shawn.guo@...aro.org>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	"cpufreq@...r.kernel.org" <cpufreq@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-pm@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] cpufreq: highbank: do not initialize array with a
 loop

On 02/25/2013 05:07 AM, Emilio López wrote:
> As uninitialized array members will be initialized to zero, we can
> avoid using a for loop by setting a value to it.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Emilio López <emilio@...pez.com.ar>
> ---
> 
> Note that I don't own any device using this driver, it has only been compile
> tested, but it shouldn't cause any issues.
> 
> Changes v1 -> v2:
>   * Move freq / 1000000 to the array definition as suggested by Viresh Kumar
> 
>  drivers/cpufreq/highbank-cpufreq.c | 8 +-------
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 7 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/highbank-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/highbank-cpufreq.c
> index 66e3a71..b61b5a3 100644
> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/highbank-cpufreq.c
> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/highbank-cpufreq.c
> @@ -28,13 +28,7 @@
>  
>  static int hb_voltage_change(unsigned int freq)
>  {
> -	int i;
> -	u32 msg[HB_CPUFREQ_IPC_LEN];
> -
> -	msg[0] = HB_CPUFREQ_CHANGE_NOTE;
> -	msg[1] = freq / 1000000;
> -	for (i = 2; i < HB_CPUFREQ_IPC_LEN; i++)
> -		msg[i] = 0;
> +	u32 msg[HB_CPUFREQ_IPC_LEN] = {HB_CPUFREQ_CHANGE_NOTE, freq / 1000000};
>  
>  	return pl320_ipc_transmit(msg);
>  }
> 
Thanks for the improvement.

Acked-By: Mark Langsdorf <mark.langsdorf@...xeda.com>

--Mark Langsdorf
Calxeda, Inc.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/