lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <512BB3E6.6000904@gmail.com>
Date:	Mon, 25 Feb 2013 11:56:38 -0700
From:	David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>
To:	Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
CC:	Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...stprotocols.net>,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
	Corey Ashford <cjashfor@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
	Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] perf tools: Fix -C option for record command

On 2/25/13 11:39 AM, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> To clarify, I am not trying to review this patch, I'd like to ask
> the question...
>
> On 02/25, Jiri Olsa wrote:
>>
>> Currently the -C option does not work for record command,
>> because of the targets mismatch when synthesizing threads.
>>
>> Fixing this by using proper target interface for the
>> synthesize decision.
>
> OK, but my fix had the different goal. I thought that
>
> 	$ perf ... record -C0 sleep 1
>
> should attach the counter to the child process (workload) and set
> event->cpu = 0 (instead of -1). With this patch we create the cpu

If a target is given (-a, -C, -p or -t) that is what the data is 
collected for -- all cpus, a cpu, or one or more task ids. The workload 
in that case becomes a means for bounding the data collection (start and 
end points).

If you want to collect events for a workload you just run perf-record -- 
workload.

Last time I dug into it (which was 8-12 months ago) -C required -a to 
work properly. -a (system_wide) meaning collect events for all cpus and 
then -C meaning but only for this cpu. Perhaps Namyhung's target changes 
may have simplified fixing that as Jiri's patch suggests.

David
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ