[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130225224339.GA19153@kroah.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2013 14:43:39 -0800
From: Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
To: Kay Sievers <kay@...y.org>
Cc: Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
Milos Vyletel <milos.vyletel@....cz>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-hotplug@...r.kernel.org,
virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org, mst@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] virtio-blk: emit udev event when device is resized
On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 11:39:52PM +0100, Kay Sievers wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 11:12 PM, Greg KH <greg@...ah.com> wrote:
>
> > Hm, I thought we were frowning apon running binaries from udev rules
> > these days, especially ones that might have big consequences (like
> > resizing a disk image) like this.
> >
> > Kay, am I right?
>
> We removed most of them from the default setups, yes. But there is
> nothing wrong if people want to ship that in some package or as custom
> rules.
>
> It looks fine to me, we would just not add such things to the default
> set of of rules these days.
>
> > We already emit KOBJECT_CHANGE events when block devices change, from
> > within the block core code. Why is the patch below needed instead of
> > using these events that are already generated? How are virtio block
> > devices special?
>
> I think we only do that for dm and md and a couple of special cases
> like loop and read-only settings.
What about when we repartition a block device? I've seen the events
happen then.
Anyway, if you are ok with this, no objection from my side then Rusty.
thanks,
greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists