[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130226044521.GC12906@thunk.org>
Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2013 23:45:21 -0500
From: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>
To: Dave Airlie <airlied@...il.com>
Cc: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Matthew Garrett <mjg59@...f.ucam.org>,
David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
Florian Weimer <fw@...eb.enyo.de>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Josh Boyer <jwboyer@...hat.com>,
Peter Jones <pjones@...hat.com>,
Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>, keyrings@...ux-nfs.org,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] Load keys from signed PE binaries
On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 02:25:55PM +1000, Dave Airlie wrote:
>
> Its a simple argument, MS can revoke our keys for whatever reason,
> reducing the surface area of reasons for them to do so seems like a
> good idea. Unless someone can read the mind of the MS guy that
> arbitrarily decides this in 5 years time, or has some sort of signed
> agreement, I tend towards protecting the users from having their Linux
> not work anymore, because we were scared of a PE loader in the kernel.
If Microsoft will revoke keys for whatever reason they want, without
any regard to the potential PR and legal consequences to Microsoft,
there's absolutely **nothing** you can do, short of choosing to use
more open hardware (for example, like the Chromebook Pixel).
If you're that terrified of the completely arbitrary and capricious
Microsoft guy having us by the short hairs, why aid and abet Microsoft
control-freak model?
- Ted
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists