linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] perf report: fix handling of memory sampling sort orders

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <8738wjtyop.fsf@sejong.aot.lge.com>
Date:	Tue, 26 Feb 2013 14:46:14 +0900
From:	Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
To:	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>
Cc:	Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, jolsa@...hat.com,
	peterz@...radead.org, mingo@...e.hu
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf report: fix handling of memory sampling sort orders

Hi,

On Fri, 22 Feb 2013 15:43:22 -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> Em Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 03:28:38PM +0100, Stephane Eranian escreveu:
>> 
>> When the memory sampling sort orders were used on perf.data
>> files without memory sampling data, it would crash perf. This
>> patch fixes this by  handling the lack of memory information
>> gracefully, printing N/A and formatting columns correctly
>> whenever necessary.

It'd be great if we could detect the perf.data contains memory sampling
data and then warn user about it and exit like I did for branch
sampling.  What do you think?

Thanks,
Namhyung
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/