[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <27240C0AC20F114CBF8149A2696CBE4A23E2CB@SHSMSX101.ccr.corp.intel.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2013 08:01:55 +0000
From: "Liu, Chuansheng" <chuansheng.liu@...el.com>
To: "tglx@...utronix.de" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"Ingo Molnar (mingo@...nel.org)" <mingo@...nel.org>
CC: "'linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org' (linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org)"
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Liu, Chuansheng" <chuansheng.liu@...el.com>,
"Chen, Jun D" <jun.d.chen@...el.com>
Subject: [Question]CLOCK_EVT_NOTIFY_BROADCAST_EXIT must be called with
interrupts disabled?
Hi,
Just found some comments as below:
In commit 0beefa208bb3a9e581a60125703
+ /*
+ * The switch back from broadcast mode needs to be
+ * called with interrupts disabled.
+ */
+ local_irq_disable();
+ clockevents_notify(CLOCK_EVT_NOTIFY_BROADCAST_EXIT, &cpu);
+ local_irq_enable();
But checked some place in kernel code, it likes below in intel_idle.c:
local_irq_enable();
if (!(lapic_timer_reliable_states & (1 << (cstate))))
clockevents_notify(CLOCK_EVT_NOTIFY_BROADCAST_EXIT, &cpu);
Which enable the irq at first, then calling CLOCK_EVT_NOTIFY_BROADCAST_EXIT.
So not sure _BROAD_EXIT must be called with interrupts disabled? Thanks your comments in advance.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists