[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <512C789D.1090404@cn.fujitsu.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2013 16:55:57 +0800
From: Zhang Yanfei <zhangyanfei@...fujitsu.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
CC: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
Simon Horman <horms@...ge.net.au>,
"kexec@...ts.infradead.org" <kexec@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] kexec: Use min_t to simplify logic
于 2013年02月26日 16:53, Andrew Morton 写道:
> On Tue, 26 Feb 2013 16:49:02 +0800 Zhang Yanfei <zhangyanfei@...fujitsu.com> wrote:
>
>>>> diff --git a/kernel/kexec.c b/kernel/kexec.c
>>> []
>>>> @@ -822,13 +822,9 @@ static int kimage_load_normal_segment(struct kimage *image,
>>> []
>>>> + mchunk = min_t(size_t, mbytes,
>>>> + (size_t)(PAGE_SIZE - (maddr & ~PAGE_MASK)));
>>>
>>> #define min_t(type, x, y) ({ \
>>> type __min1 = (x); \
>>> type __min2 = (y); \
>>> __min1 < __min2 ? __min1: __min2; })
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>> Hmm, from the definition, the cast is redundant.
>>
>> Maybe I misunderstood what Andrew meant in the mail related to v2:
>>
>> "The types of PAGE_SIZE and PAGE_MASK are vague - iirc they once had
>> different types on different architectures, so some form of casting is
>> unavoidable here."
>>
>> Andrew, could you please explain the casting you meant above?
>
> I mean that a cast (or min_t, which is a cast) will be needed.
> The code you have here casts the same thing two times, which isn't
> necessary.
>
>
Thanks.
Should I resend the patch again? After removing this redundant cast,
it is the same with v2.
Zhang
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists