[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130226093030.GA21763@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2013 11:30:30 +0200
From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
To: Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>, Asias He <asias@...hat.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/16] virtio_ring: virtqueue_add_sgs, to add multiple
sgs.
On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 03:44:26PM +1030, Rusty Russell wrote:
> "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com> writes:
> > On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 06:26:20PM +1030, Rusty Russell wrote:
> >> virtio_scsi can really use this, to avoid the current hack of copying
> >> the whole sg array. Some other things get slightly neater, too.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
> >
> > Hmm, this makes add_buf a bit slower. virtio_test results
> > (I'll send a patch to update the test shortly):
> >
> > Before:
> > 0.09user 0.01system 0:00.12elapsed 91%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 480maxresident)k
> > 0inputs+0outputs (0major+145minor)pagefaults 0swaps
> >
> > After:
> > 0.11user 0.01system 0:00.13elapsed 90%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 480maxresident)k
> > 0inputs+0outputs (0major+145minor)pagefaults 0swaps
>
> Interesting: how much of this is due to the shim in virtqueue_add_buf()
> to clean up the sg arrays?
>
> (Perhaps we should make virtio_test run for longer, too).
>
> BTW, you might be interested in:
> https://github.com/rustyrussell/stats.git
>
> Which provides a useful filter for multiple results.
>
> Cheers,
> Rusty.
Nifty.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists