[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130226121425.GB17704@verge.net.au>
Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2013 21:14:26 +0900
From: Simon Horman <horms@...ge.net.au>
To: Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@...il.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kuninori.morimoto.gx@...esas.com,
linux-sh@...r.kernel.org, benh@...nel.crashing.org,
grant.likely@...retlab.ca, tglx@...utronix.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/05] irqchip: Renesas INTC External IRQ pin v2 update
On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 08:58:34PM +0900, Magnus Damm wrote:
> irqchip: Renesas INTC External IRQ pin v2 update
>
> [PATCH 01/05] irqchip: intc-irqpin: Whitespace fixes
> [PATCH 02/05] irqchip: intc-irqpin: Cache mapped IRQ
> [PATCH 03/05] irqchip: intc-irqpin: Add force comments
> [PATCH 04/05] irqchip: intc-irqpin: Make use of devm functions
> [PATCH 05/05] irqchip: intc-irqpin: GPL header for platform data
>
> These patches update the v1 of the INTC External IRQ pin driver
> in various ways based on feedback kindly received from:
> - Simon Horman
> - Kuninori Morimoto
> - Thomas Gleixner
>
> With the series applied I see the driver as "v2", but
> I prefer to keep these changes as incremental ones instead
> of redoing a single "v2" patch for the driver. The reason
> behind this is that there are on-going back porting efforts
> that are better dealt with using incremental patches.
I have added these to the topic/intc-external-irq branch of the renesas
tree, although at this stage I anticipate that the code will be merged
through a different tree.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists