[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130226225205.GA13338@animalcreek.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2013 15:52:05 -0700
From: "Mark A. Greer" <mgreer@...malcreek.com>
To: Tim Gardner <tim.gardner@...onical.com>
Cc: herbert@...dor.apana.org.au, dmitry.kasatkin@...el.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@...el.com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>,
linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
linux-omap <linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: crypto: omap-sham, omap-aes and
dma_request_slave_channel_compat()
[CC'ing more people & lists.]
On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 11:36:46AM -0700, Tim Gardner wrote:
> Whats up with commits 0e87e73f4abe1ada69cf780fe2550c6361a1b53b and
> b4b87a934c30fb91cbdd18ae028acdc361e1cf0f. As far as I can tell,
> dma_request_slave_channel_compat() does not exist in 3.9 as of
> 52caa59ed335616c5254adff7911465a57ed9f14, nor does it exist in
> linux-next as of Feb 26. Am I just being dense ?
Yeah, order got a little messed up. The problem is known and the
sub-thread talking about it starts about here:
http://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg225241.html
with the conclusion (AFAICT) that Vinod is to push it:
http://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg226062.html
> Reverting those 2 commits at least allows the compile complete.
When the dependencies are sorted out, will you revert the revert
or do I need to do something?
Mark
--
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists