| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <20130226235621.212198523@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2013 15:57:42 -0800
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org, Sagi Grimberg <sagig@...lanox.co.il>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Haggai Eran <haggaie@...lanox.com>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ibm.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: [ 13/53] mm: mmu_notifier: have mmu_notifiers use a global SRCU so they may safely schedule
3.0-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Sagi Grimberg <sagig@...lanox.co.il>
commit 21a92735f660eaecf69a6f2e777f18463760ec32 upstream.
With an RCU based mmu_notifier implementation, any callout to
mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_{start,end}() or
mmu_notifier_invalidate_page() would not be allowed to call schedule()
as that could potentially allow a modification to the mmu_notifier
structure while it is currently being used.
Since srcu allocs 4 machine words per instance per cpu, we may end up
with memory exhaustion if we use srcu per mm. So all mms share a global
srcu. Note that during large mmu_notifier activity exit & unregister
paths might hang for longer periods, but it is tolerable for current
mmu_notifier clients.
Signed-off-by: Sagi Grimberg <sagig@...lanox.co.il>
Signed-off-by: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
Cc: Haggai Eran <haggaie@...lanox.com>
Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
include/linux/mmu_notifier.h | 1
mm/mmu_notifier.c | 73 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------
2 files changed, 49 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
--- a/include/linux/mmu_notifier.h
+++ b/include/linux/mmu_notifier.h
@@ -4,6 +4,7 @@
#include <linux/list.h>
#include <linux/spinlock.h>
#include <linux/mm_types.h>
+#include <linux/srcu.h>
struct mmu_notifier;
struct mmu_notifier_ops;
--- a/mm/mmu_notifier.c
+++ b/mm/mmu_notifier.c
@@ -14,10 +14,14 @@
#include <linux/module.h>
#include <linux/mm.h>
#include <linux/err.h>
+#include <linux/srcu.h>
#include <linux/rcupdate.h>
#include <linux/sched.h>
#include <linux/slab.h>
+/* global SRCU for all MMs */
+struct srcu_struct srcu;
+
/*
* This function can't run concurrently against mmu_notifier_register
* because mm->mm_users > 0 during mmu_notifier_register and exit_mmap
@@ -25,8 +29,8 @@
* in parallel despite there being no task using this mm any more,
* through the vmas outside of the exit_mmap context, such as with
* vmtruncate. This serializes against mmu_notifier_unregister with
- * the mmu_notifier_mm->lock in addition to RCU and it serializes
- * against the other mmu notifiers with RCU. struct mmu_notifier_mm
+ * the mmu_notifier_mm->lock in addition to SRCU and it serializes
+ * against the other mmu notifiers with SRCU. struct mmu_notifier_mm
* can't go away from under us as exit_mmap holds an mm_count pin
* itself.
*/
@@ -34,12 +38,13 @@ void __mmu_notifier_release(struct mm_st
{
struct mmu_notifier *mn;
struct hlist_node *n;
+ int id;
/*
* RCU here will block mmu_notifier_unregister until
* ->release returns.
*/
- rcu_read_lock();
+ id = srcu_read_lock(&srcu);
hlist_for_each_entry_rcu(mn, n, &mm->mmu_notifier_mm->list, hlist)
/*
* if ->release runs before mmu_notifier_unregister it
@@ -50,7 +55,7 @@ void __mmu_notifier_release(struct mm_st
*/
if (mn->ops->release)
mn->ops->release(mn, mm);
- rcu_read_unlock();
+ srcu_read_unlock(&srcu, id);
spin_lock(&mm->mmu_notifier_mm->lock);
while (unlikely(!hlist_empty(&mm->mmu_notifier_mm->list))) {
@@ -68,7 +73,7 @@ void __mmu_notifier_release(struct mm_st
spin_unlock(&mm->mmu_notifier_mm->lock);
/*
- * synchronize_rcu here prevents mmu_notifier_release to
+ * synchronize_srcu here prevents mmu_notifier_release to
* return to exit_mmap (which would proceed freeing all pages
* in the mm) until the ->release method returns, if it was
* invoked by mmu_notifier_unregister.
@@ -76,7 +81,7 @@ void __mmu_notifier_release(struct mm_st
* The mmu_notifier_mm can't go away from under us because one
* mm_count is hold by exit_mmap.
*/
- synchronize_rcu();
+ synchronize_srcu(&srcu);
}
/*
@@ -89,14 +94,14 @@ int __mmu_notifier_clear_flush_young(str
{
struct mmu_notifier *mn;
struct hlist_node *n;
- int young = 0;
+ int young = 0, id;
- rcu_read_lock();
+ id = srcu_read_lock(&srcu);
hlist_for_each_entry_rcu(mn, n, &mm->mmu_notifier_mm->list, hlist) {
if (mn->ops->clear_flush_young)
young |= mn->ops->clear_flush_young(mn, mm, address);
}
- rcu_read_unlock();
+ srcu_read_unlock(&srcu, id);
return young;
}
@@ -106,9 +111,9 @@ int __mmu_notifier_test_young(struct mm_
{
struct mmu_notifier *mn;
struct hlist_node *n;
- int young = 0;
+ int young = 0, id;
- rcu_read_lock();
+ id = srcu_read_lock(&srcu);
hlist_for_each_entry_rcu(mn, n, &mm->mmu_notifier_mm->list, hlist) {
if (mn->ops->test_young) {
young = mn->ops->test_young(mn, mm, address);
@@ -116,7 +121,7 @@ int __mmu_notifier_test_young(struct mm_
break;
}
}
- rcu_read_unlock();
+ srcu_read_unlock(&srcu, id);
return young;
}
@@ -126,8 +131,9 @@ void __mmu_notifier_change_pte(struct mm
{
struct mmu_notifier *mn;
struct hlist_node *n;
+ int id;
- rcu_read_lock();
+ id = srcu_read_lock(&srcu);
hlist_for_each_entry_rcu(mn, n, &mm->mmu_notifier_mm->list, hlist) {
if (mn->ops->change_pte)
mn->ops->change_pte(mn, mm, address, pte);
@@ -138,7 +144,7 @@ void __mmu_notifier_change_pte(struct mm
else if (mn->ops->invalidate_page)
mn->ops->invalidate_page(mn, mm, address);
}
- rcu_read_unlock();
+ srcu_read_unlock(&srcu, id);
}
void __mmu_notifier_invalidate_page(struct mm_struct *mm,
@@ -146,13 +152,14 @@ void __mmu_notifier_invalidate_page(stru
{
struct mmu_notifier *mn;
struct hlist_node *n;
+ int id;
- rcu_read_lock();
+ id = srcu_read_lock(&srcu);
hlist_for_each_entry_rcu(mn, n, &mm->mmu_notifier_mm->list, hlist) {
if (mn->ops->invalidate_page)
mn->ops->invalidate_page(mn, mm, address);
}
- rcu_read_unlock();
+ srcu_read_unlock(&srcu, id);
}
void __mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_start(struct mm_struct *mm,
@@ -160,13 +167,14 @@ void __mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_sta
{
struct mmu_notifier *mn;
struct hlist_node *n;
+ int id;
- rcu_read_lock();
+ id = srcu_read_lock(&srcu);
hlist_for_each_entry_rcu(mn, n, &mm->mmu_notifier_mm->list, hlist) {
if (mn->ops->invalidate_range_start)
mn->ops->invalidate_range_start(mn, mm, start, end);
}
- rcu_read_unlock();
+ srcu_read_unlock(&srcu, id);
}
void __mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_end(struct mm_struct *mm,
@@ -174,13 +182,14 @@ void __mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_end
{
struct mmu_notifier *mn;
struct hlist_node *n;
+ int id;
- rcu_read_lock();
+ id = srcu_read_lock(&srcu);
hlist_for_each_entry_rcu(mn, n, &mm->mmu_notifier_mm->list, hlist) {
if (mn->ops->invalidate_range_end)
mn->ops->invalidate_range_end(mn, mm, start, end);
}
- rcu_read_unlock();
+ srcu_read_unlock(&srcu, id);
}
static int do_mmu_notifier_register(struct mmu_notifier *mn,
@@ -192,6 +201,12 @@ static int do_mmu_notifier_register(stru
BUG_ON(atomic_read(&mm->mm_users) <= 0);
+ /*
+ * Verify that mmu_notifier_init() already run and the global srcu is
+ * initialized.
+ */
+ BUG_ON(!srcu.per_cpu_ref);
+
ret = -ENOMEM;
mmu_notifier_mm = kmalloc(sizeof(struct mmu_notifier_mm), GFP_KERNEL);
if (unlikely(!mmu_notifier_mm))
@@ -274,8 +289,8 @@ void __mmu_notifier_mm_destroy(struct mm
/*
* This releases the mm_count pin automatically and frees the mm
* structure if it was the last user of it. It serializes against
- * running mmu notifiers with RCU and against mmu_notifier_unregister
- * with the unregister lock + RCU. All sptes must be dropped before
+ * running mmu notifiers with SRCU and against mmu_notifier_unregister
+ * with the unregister lock + SRCU. All sptes must be dropped before
* calling mmu_notifier_unregister. ->release or any other notifier
* method may be invoked concurrently with mmu_notifier_unregister,
* and only after mmu_notifier_unregister returned we're guaranteed
@@ -290,8 +305,9 @@ void mmu_notifier_unregister(struct mmu_
* RCU here will force exit_mmap to wait ->release to finish
* before freeing the pages.
*/
- rcu_read_lock();
+ int id;
+ id = srcu_read_lock(&srcu);
/*
* exit_mmap will block in mmu_notifier_release to
* guarantee ->release is called before freeing the
@@ -299,7 +315,7 @@ void mmu_notifier_unregister(struct mmu_
*/
if (mn->ops->release)
mn->ops->release(mn, mm);
- rcu_read_unlock();
+ srcu_read_unlock(&srcu, id);
spin_lock(&mm->mmu_notifier_mm->lock);
hlist_del_rcu(&mn->hlist);
@@ -310,10 +326,17 @@ void mmu_notifier_unregister(struct mmu_
* Wait any running method to finish, of course including
* ->release if it was run by mmu_notifier_relase instead of us.
*/
- synchronize_rcu();
+ synchronize_srcu(&srcu);
BUG_ON(atomic_read(&mm->mm_count) <= 0);
mmdrop(mm);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(mmu_notifier_unregister);
+
+static int __init mmu_notifier_init(void)
+{
+ return init_srcu_struct(&srcu);
+}
+
+module_init(mmu_notifier_init);
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists