lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2013 15:54:24 -0800 From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, stable@...r.kernel.org, Edward Donovan <edward.donovan@...ble.net>, "Wang, Song-Bo (Stoney)" <song-bo.wang@...com>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de> Subject: [ 007/150] genirq: Avoid deadlock in spurious handling 3.8-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. ------------------ From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de> commit e716efde75267eab919cdb2bef5b2cb77f305326 upstream. commit 52553ddf(genirq: fix regression in irqfixup, irqpoll) introduced a potential deadlock by calling the action handler with the irq descriptor lock held. Remove the call and let the handling code run even for an interrupt where only a single action is registered. That matches the goal of the above commit and avoids the deadlock. Document the confusing action = desc->action reload in the handling loop while at it. Reported-and-tested-by: "Wang, Warner" <warner.wang@...com> Tested-by: Edward Donovan <edward.donovan@...ble.net> Cc: "Wang, Song-Bo (Stoney)" <song-bo.wang@...com> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> --- kernel/irq/spurious.c | 7 +++---- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) --- a/kernel/irq/spurious.c +++ b/kernel/irq/spurious.c @@ -80,13 +80,11 @@ static int try_one_irq(int irq, struct i /* * All handlers must agree on IRQF_SHARED, so we test just the - * first. Check for action->next as well. + * first. */ action = desc->action; if (!action || !(action->flags & IRQF_SHARED) || - (action->flags & __IRQF_TIMER) || - (action->handler(irq, action->dev_id) == IRQ_HANDLED) || - !action->next) + (action->flags & __IRQF_TIMER)) goto out; /* Already running on another processor */ @@ -104,6 +102,7 @@ static int try_one_irq(int irq, struct i do { if (handle_irq_event(desc) == IRQ_HANDLED) ret = IRQ_HANDLED; + /* Make sure that there is still a valid action */ action = desc->action; } while ((desc->istate & IRQS_PENDING) && action); desc->istate &= ~IRQS_POLL_INPROGRESS; -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists